Dr Agata Stepnik discusses digital ethnography

In this video interview, Post-doctoral research fellow Dr. Agata Stepnik talks about the importance of digital ethnography as a research method and the need for situated and observational methods in understanding digital cultures.

Transcipt

“I was exploring how everyday users of social media try to shape what appears in their feeds, and whether that influences the amount of news content they encounter. Often, we learn about the world through informal sources—friends, family, influencers, celebrities—so I wanted to understand how much of the information people receive is professional news versus cultural commentary.

By directly observing how people use social media, I could see how often news appeared in their feeds, where it came from, and whether they noticed or engaged with it. Since social media content can come from anyone, this raised questions about what counts as public content. Posts from celebrities or public figures are clearly public, but what about content from friends or family with private accounts? If a participant has access to that content, it’s not truly public, yet I was still seeing it.

This made it essential to consider how to manage the research ethically—not just to protect participants, but also the people whose content might be visible. In my study, I took notes by hand while observing. Participants could also keep a personal archive of screenshots between sessions, but they were only allowed to share those on screen after redacting any identifying information, unless the content was from a public figure.

To ensure transparency, each participant posted a pinned message or story on their social media account explaining that they were part of a research project and that a researcher might be viewing their content. We also provided a guide on how to make content private if they didn’t want it seen between sessions. Importantly, participants always had the option to say, “I don’t want to show you this,” or “Let’s skip this account today.”

Share this article

Related Articles

Time for Trust: Can we trust Hollywood?

In this episode, Associate Professor Bruce Isaacs dives into the crisis of trust in images – from Hollywood to Instagram – and explains why we may no longer know what’s real. It’s a timely, provocative discussion about how cinema, digital media and AI are reshaping our relationship to truth itself.

Summer Reflections on Australia’s Social Media Minimum Age Laws

It is unusual to find yourself as a digital media researcher in Australia being at the forefront of global policy debates. Given the talk about the three great Digital Empires – the US, EU and China – who set the global agenda, the place for middle-sized powers to be taking a policy lead around digital tech would seem to be limited.

How do Platforms Matter?

The paper ‘How do platforms matter? Media power, platform power and the digital domination of Australian media’, co-authored by Terry Flew (University of Sydney) and Cameron McTernan (Adelaide University) has now been published by International Communications Gazette. The paper is part of a special issue ‘Networks of Power: Media and Internet Concentration, Platform Capitalism, and the Future of Democracy’, edited by Dwayne Winseck (Carleton University). The special issue is part of the Global Media and Internet Concentration Project (GMICP), funded through the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

Digital policy as problem space: Australia’s social media age restrictions for under-16s

On December 10, 2025, the Online Safety Act (Social Media Minimum Age) Amendment, which was passed by both Australian Federal Houses of Parliament 12 months earlier, was implemented. This marked the onset of what is known globally as Australia’s social media ban for under-16s. In practice it involves those under 16 being restricted from holding accounts on ten platforms designated by the Office of the eSafety Commissioner, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, Reddit and Snapchat.