‘Huge achievement’: Labor hails wave of under-16 social media account deletions, restrictions

SBS News

By Zacharias Szumer Published 15 January 2026 10:38pm

The government has hailed data showing over 4.7 million under-16 accounts had been deactivated, removed or restricted within days of social media restrictions coming into effect, with one minister calling it a “huge achievement”.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said it was “encouraging that social media companies are making meaningful effort to comply with laws and keep kids off their platforms”.

“Change doesn’t happen overnight. But these early signs show it’s important we’ve acted to make this change,” he said in a statement sent to media outlets on Thursday, which also contained the preliminary figures provided to the eSafety Commissioner.

Communications Minister Anika Wells said the number of under-16 social media accounts that had been deactivated after the laws took effect on 10 December was a “huge achievement”.

“We’ve said from the beginning that we weren’t expecting perfection straight away – but early figures are showing this law is making a real, meaningful difference,” she said in the statement.

“We know there’s more work to do and the eSafety Commissioner is looking closely at this data to determine what it shows in terms of individual platforms’ compliance.”

‘We’ll need more data’

University of Sydney researcher Timothy Koskie told SBS News that 4.7 million was an “extraordinarily high number” but cautioned that “some of those accounts are going to be multiple platforms for individuals”.

He said that, given the number of platforms included in the ban, and the number of “particularly socially media savvy kids”, it was impossible to tell how many under-16s had actually stopped using social media.

“We can see that it’s shutting down accounts and that was one of the slated things that they were going to do,” said Koskie, who is a post-doctoral associate at the university’s School of Media and Communications.

“As far as the top line item of protecting youth from the risks of social media, it might be a little bit of a bridge to say that shutting down the accounts means protecting the youth, because we don’t necessarily know, for instance, that the accounts haven’t been opened under other names or that protections haven’t been bypassed through parents,” he said.

“We’ll need more data in order to know how that’s rolling out.”

Digital Rights Watch chair Lizzie O’Shea echoed those concerns, saying the “number of accounts deleted is not the measure of the success or failure of the ban”.

“This is measured by its effect on young people’s wellbeing. By that yardstick, the ban continues to fail. Teens are flocking to mental health crisis services as they come to terms with being cut off from their support networks,” she told SBS News.

“The social media ban has not made life better for Australian teens. For many of them, particularly the most vulnerable, it has caused grave harm.”

Digital Rights Watch opposed the introduction of the social media age limit, calling instead for more regulation of social media companies.

The government said the eSafety Commissioner’s office would continue to closely monitor social media platforms to ensure they were complying with their obligations.

According to Thursday’s statement, the eSafety website has recorded more than one million visits since the launch of the social media age limit’s education campaign, which the government said showed that Australians were engaging with the ban and seeking clear, reliable information about the changes.

To read the full article click here

Share this article

More News

Newsrooms unite to defend trusted journalism in AI age

Australians are being urged to look beyond the headline and understand how journalism is made as news organisations confront a rapidly changing information landscape dominated by social media algorithms and AI.

How to tame your feed

It was great getting a sense of the deep ethnographic research Agata has undertaken and the links between digital literacy and digital empowerment. What I took away from the conversation was a sense that the algorithms that drive our feeds are not just code, they have a shape and form that evolves based on our interactions. While I would put myself in an ‘algorithms are bad’ camp, I find more people I speak with saying they like their algorithm, it makes their life easier, they just want it to do its work without all the slop and noise. This is where the business models behind the social media platforms come in and left to their own devices, will serve copy to maximise time on screen through extreme content. Counteracting that with hacks like conscious engagement could change our online experiences for the better.

Five things to understand about how the OpenAI hack unfolded

The Albanese government is scrambling to answer questions about national security and the dangers posed by artificial intelligence following revelations that a rogue AI agent deployed by OpenAI hacked sensitive Australian data, including aggregate Medicare records. Social media platforms would have to ask users, through prompts that appear from time to time, whether they want to keep a personalised, algorithm-driven feed or instead see mostly the accounts they have chosen to follow.

TV in Australia turns 70. What’s next?

As the nation celebrates seven decades of broadcast television, the industry also confronts questions about the future in an increasingly digital world. For more on this, we spoke with Dr Timothy Koskie, a post-doctoral research associate at The University of Sydney’s Centre for AI Trust and Governance.