Time for Trust podcast – Professor James Arvanitakis, Director of the Forrest Research Foundation

This conversation revolves around issues of political polarization, trust, and social cohesion, featuring James Arvanitakis, Professor and Director of the Forrest Research Foundation. He discusses the challenges facing modern societies, particularly in Australia and the United States, where declining trust in institutions has led to social fragmentation.

The Forrest Research Foundation, founded by a $130 million donation from Andrew and Nicola Forrest, aims to transform Western Australia into a global knowledge hub by attracting early career researchers from across the world to work at one of the state’s five universities.

James’s own work in higher education, particularly at Western Sydney University, focused on increasing accessibility for first-generation university students and promoting diversity. He reflects on his own struggles as a first-generation student and the importance of creating an inclusive learning environment. His passion for community engagement has led him to work with various NGOs and organizations like Diversity Arts Australia.

Like education, arts can play a crucial role in reflecting society and sparking dialogue, particularly around social issues.

Understanding Political Polarization

In the podcast, James Arvanitakis shares insights from his time as a Fulbright Fellow at the University of Wyoming, where he sought to understand the appeal of Donald Trump, especially among working-class Americans. He criticizes the tendency of political discourse to reduce Trump supporters to stereotypes and stresses the importance of respectful disagreement. He highlights economic anxieties, employment concerns, and shifts in traditional industries as key drivers of Trump’s popularity.

They are all issues which progressives have struggled to respond to and must be understand if they are to recapture this support base.

Respectful Disagreement & Social Trust

A central theme in the discussion is the importance of fostering dialogue across political and ideological divides. Arvanitakis argues that polarization leads people to take extreme, inflexible positions, often amplified by social media. He advocates for nuanced discussions that acknowledge valid concerns from different perspectives.

The Role of Digital Technologies

On the impact of digital technologies, he sees social media as a double-edged sword. While it enables connection, it can also reinforce echo chambers and misinformation. He opposes blanket bans on social media and instead supports education on responsible usage.

Trust in Institutions & Society

Trust in institutions has declined due to perceived corruption, inefficiency, and disconnection from everyday concerns. He references Anthony Giddens’ theory that modern societies outsource trust to abstract systems, and when these systems fail, people experience a sense of dread. Arvanitakis connects this to issues like distrust in vaccines and political institutions.

Lessons from Global Examples

Discussing global political shifts, he notes that many countries, including Greece and Australia, are facing social cohesion challenges due to economic pressures and migration. He warns against both oversimplified populist solutions and the dismissal of people’s concerns – both fail to address underlying structural issues.

Universities as Agents of Change

James Arvanitakis emphasizes that universities must foster open debate and intellectual diversity – creative brave not just safe spaces. He believes institutions should engage more with communities and be places where even controversial ideas can be discussed freely. He also advocates for integrating humanities and sciences to address ethical questions in technology and policymaking.

Final Thoughts

James Arvanitakis concludes by stressing the need for better public engagement, education reform, and policies that acknowledge the complexities of social and economic changes. His approach centers on creating a more inclusive and thoughtful public discourse, resisting polarization, engaging populations and communities – even those we disagree with – and rebuilding trust in democratic institutions.

Listen to conversations

Share this article

Related Articles

Time for Trust: Can we trust Hollywood?

In this episode, Associate Professor Bruce Isaacs dives into the crisis of trust in images – from Hollywood to Instagram – and explains why we may no longer know what’s real. It’s a timely, provocative discussion about how cinema, digital media and AI are reshaping our relationship to truth itself.

Summer Reflections on Australia’s Social Media Minimum Age Laws

It is unusual to find yourself as a digital media researcher in Australia being at the forefront of global policy debates. Given the talk about the three great Digital Empires – the US, EU and China – who set the global agenda, the place for middle-sized powers to be taking a policy lead around digital tech would seem to be limited.

How do Platforms Matter?

The paper ‘How do platforms matter? Media power, platform power and the digital domination of Australian media’, co-authored by Terry Flew (University of Sydney) and Cameron McTernan (Adelaide University) has now been published by International Communications Gazette. The paper is part of a special issue ‘Networks of Power: Media and Internet Concentration, Platform Capitalism, and the Future of Democracy’, edited by Dwayne Winseck (Carleton University). The special issue is part of the Global Media and Internet Concentration Project (GMICP), funded through the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

Digital policy as problem space: Australia’s social media age restrictions for under-16s

On December 10, 2025, the Online Safety Act (Social Media Minimum Age) Amendment, which was passed by both Australian Federal Houses of Parliament 12 months earlier, was implemented. This marked the onset of what is known globally as Australia’s social media ban for under-16s. In practice it involves those under 16 being restricted from holding accounts on ten platforms designated by the Office of the eSafety Commissioner, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, Reddit and Snapchat.