Mediated Trust

Contact

Dr Agata Stepnik discusses digital ethnography

In this video interview, Post-doctoral research fellow Dr. Agata Stepnik talks about the importance of digital ethnography as a research method and the need for situated and observational methods in understanding digital cultures.

Transcipt

“I was exploring how everyday users of social media try to shape what appears in their feeds, and whether that influences the amount of news content they encounter. Often, we learn about the world through informal sources—friends, family, influencers, celebrities—so I wanted to understand how much of the information people receive is professional news versus cultural commentary.

By directly observing how people use social media, I could see how often news appeared in their feeds, where it came from, and whether they noticed or engaged with it. Since social media content can come from anyone, this raised questions about what counts as public content. Posts from celebrities or public figures are clearly public, but what about content from friends or family with private accounts? If a participant has access to that content, it’s not truly public, yet I was still seeing it.

This made it essential to consider how to manage the research ethically—not just to protect participants, but also the people whose content might be visible. In my study, I took notes by hand while observing. Participants could also keep a personal archive of screenshots between sessions, but they were only allowed to share those on screen after redacting any identifying information, unless the content was from a public figure.

To ensure transparency, each participant posted a pinned message or story on their social media account explaining that they were part of a research project and that a researcher might be viewing their content. We also provided a guide on how to make content private if they didn’t want it seen between sessions. Importantly, participants always had the option to say, “I don’t want to show you this,” or “Let’s skip this account today.”

Share this article

Related Articles

Killing the chicken to scare the monkey: the curious progressive urge to take down Australia’s social media minimum age rules

Evidence from Australia after three months of the Online Safety (Social Media Minimum Age Amendment) Act is that outcomes have been ambiguous. A Compliance Update Report released by the Office of the eSafety Commissioner in March 2026 found that while almost half of surveyed parents had at least one child with their own social media account prior to the restrictions coming into effect, this proportion had decreased to nearly one third following implementation of the ban. Notably, of the parents who reported their child had an account on each platform prior to 10 December 2025, around 7 in 10 reported that their child still had an account, with only 3 in 10 reporting that their child no longer had an account.

Why we are not in a post-truth era

Discussions about trust have characteristically tied the concept closely to that of truth. When we are asked why we consider a particular person trustworthy, the question of whether they tell the truth is likely to feature highly. As the great physicist and Nobel Prize winner Albert Einstein observed, ‘Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters’.

To age-gate or not to age-gate? The Australian Social Media Minimum Age legislation and its international impact

When Australia implemented the world’s first legislated social media minimum age  restrictions on 10 December 2025, it attracted significant global attention. The Australian Science Media Centre recorded that the 52 academics registered as experts on the subject were sourced in over 2600 news items worldwide in December 2025 alone. It was extensively covered by virtually every major international news outlet, and I did interviews with BBC, CNN, Al-Jazeera, The Times, Asahi Shimbun and many others.  

Time for Trust: Can we trust Hollywood?

In this episode, Associate Professor Bruce Isaacs dives into the crisis of trust in images – from Hollywood to Instagram – and explains why we may no longer know what’s real. It’s a timely, provocative discussion about how cinema, digital media and AI are reshaping our relationship to truth itself.