Dr Agata Stepnik discusses digital ethnography

In this video interview, Post-doctoral research fellow Dr. Agata Stepnik talks about the importance of digital ethnography as a research method and the need for situated and observational methods in understanding digital cultures.

Transcipt

“I was exploring how everyday users of social media try to shape what appears in their feeds, and whether that influences the amount of news content they encounter. Often, we learn about the world through informal sources—friends, family, influencers, celebrities—so I wanted to understand how much of the information people receive is professional news versus cultural commentary.

By directly observing how people use social media, I could see how often news appeared in their feeds, where it came from, and whether they noticed or engaged with it. Since social media content can come from anyone, this raised questions about what counts as public content. Posts from celebrities or public figures are clearly public, but what about content from friends or family with private accounts? If a participant has access to that content, it’s not truly public, yet I was still seeing it.

This made it essential to consider how to manage the research ethically—not just to protect participants, but also the people whose content might be visible. In my study, I took notes by hand while observing. Participants could also keep a personal archive of screenshots between sessions, but they were only allowed to share those on screen after redacting any identifying information, unless the content was from a public figure.

To ensure transparency, each participant posted a pinned message or story on their social media account explaining that they were part of a research project and that a researcher might be viewing their content. We also provided a guide on how to make content private if they didn’t want it seen between sessions. Importantly, participants always had the option to say, “I don’t want to show you this,” or “Let’s skip this account today.”

Share this article

Related Articles

Nation-States, Civil Society and Social Media Regulation: Why was there so much global interest in Australia’s social media minimum age restrictions?

Australia’s social media minimum age legislation has become one of the most influential digital policy developments of recent years. While it has often been discussed as a response to concerns about children and social media, I argue that its significance extends well beyond youth protection. The legislation is better understood as part of a broader transformation in internet governance, in which democratic governments are seeking to reassert regulatory authority over global digital platforms.

International education’s social licence: what students, communities and data are telling

International education’s social licence is increasingly discussed in terms of public trust, community acceptance and economic contribution. While much of the debate focuses on how international education is perceived by the Australian public, less attention is paid to whether international students themselves trust the institutions and policies on which they depend.

Opening Remarks to the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence

I would like to begin by thanking the Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence for inviting me to be here today. I would like to acknowledge that I am on the ancestral lands of the Gadigal people. I would also like to commend the Committee for the timeliness of this consultation.

Australia’s Social Media Minimum Age Restrictions and the Policy Cycle

The implementation of minimum age restrictions on access to selected social media platforms for under-16s has given Australia a unique position in what has become a global debate about social media age-based bans. Five other countries having now adopted such measures – Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, China and Brazil – and at least 24 other countries considering such policies, including the United Kingdom (UK), France and Canada.  As a result, Australia has acquired a position in global Internet policy debates incommensurate with its overall size and significance in the global digital economy.